<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>cycle counting &#8211; RFID News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rfidnews.co.uk/tag/cycle-counting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rfidnews.co.uk</link>
	<description>New RFID Implementations, Hardware and Tags</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>The Total Cost of NOT Implementing RFID</title>
		<link>https://www.rfidnews.co.uk/2026/08/16/the-total-cost-of-not-implementing-rfid/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rfidnews.co.uk/2026/08/16/the-total-cost-of-not-implementing-rfid/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Houldsworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle counting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnichannel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shrinkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UHF RFID]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rfidnews.co.uk/?p=581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Barcode-only operations run at 65 to 75 per cent inventory accuracy, while RFID sites routinely sit above 95 per cent. That gap is stock you cannot sell, labour you keep re-buying and customers you quietly lose. A tour of the invisible line items that never appear on any vendor quote.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most conversations about RFID focus on what the technology costs. Hardware, tags, integration, training. These are real numbers and they deserve scrutiny. But there is a question that rarely gets asked with the same rigour: what does it cost to <em>not</em> implement RFID?</p>
<p>That cost is not on any invoice. It sits inside your operation quietly, every day, eating margin. Here is where it lives.</p>
<h2>Lost and Misplaced Inventory</h2>
<p>Shrinkage in retail and warehousing is routinely accepted as a fact of life. Goods go missing, counts are wrong, stock is misplaced in the wrong location. Without RFID, you have no real-time visibility into where any individual item is at any given moment. A barcode system tells you what arrived at the dock. It does not tell you where that item is right now.</p>
<p>Studies in retail consistently show that RFID inventory accuracy sits above 95%, compared to 65-75% with manual or barcode-based systems. That 20-30 percentage point gap is not an abstraction. It is stock you cannot sell, stock you re-order unnecessarily, and stock you write off at the end of the year.</p>
<h2>Manual Labour You Are Already Paying For</h2>
<p>A standard manual stocktake in a mid-size retail store or warehouse takes days. Staff are pulled from other tasks. Errors creep in. The process has to be repeated. With a handheld RFID reader, the same job takes hours, sometimes minutes, and delivers far higher accuracy.</p>
<p>If you are running monthly cycle counts with manual methods, you are paying that labour cost twelve times a year. Every year. That is not an investment with a payback period. That is dead cost, repeating indefinitely.</p>
<h2>Slow Cycle Counts and Their Downstream Damage</h2>
<p>Infrequent or inaccurate cycle counts create a ripple effect. Your ERP or WMS is running on stale data. Purchasing decisions are made on numbers that do not reflect reality. Safety stock levels are wrong. You overorder to compensate for the uncertainty. Carrying costs rise. Customer-facing availability data is unreliable.</p>
<p>Each of these is a cost. Some are direct, some are harder to quantify. All of them are avoidable.</p>
<h2>Poor Customer Experience</h2>
<p>A customer asks whether an item is in stock. Your system says yes. The pick or the search turns up nothing. That moment, however small it seems, has a measurable outcome: the sale does not happen, and depending on how it was handled, you may have lost that customer permanently.</p>
<p>Inaccurate inventory is the root cause of a significant proportion of out-of-stock incidents that are not actually true out-of-stocks. The item is somewhere in the building. You just do not know where. RFID solves this specifically and directly.</p>
<h2>Missed Omnichannel Capability</h2>
<p>Buy online, pick up in store. Ship from store. Reserve and collect. These fulfilment models are now customer expectations, not differentiators. Every one of them depends on accurate, real-time inventory data at the item level.</p>
<p>Without RFID, omnichannel execution is unreliable. You either over-promise and disappoint, or you under-promise to protect yourself and leave revenue on the table. Neither is a sustainable position.</p>
<h2>The Real Comparison</h2>
<p>The cost of implementing RFID is visible and time-limited. The cost of not implementing it is invisible, continuous, and compounding. When you evaluate RFID properly, the question is not whether you can afford to do it. It is whether you can afford to keep not doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rfidnews.co.uk/2026/08/16/the-total-cost-of-not-implementing-rfid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<enclosure url="https://rfidnews.b-cdn.net/2026/08/16-08-26.png?width=1200&#038;aspect_ratio=16:9&#038;quality=85" type="image/png" length="0" />
<media:content url="https://rfidnews.b-cdn.net/2026/08/16-08-26.png?width=1200&#038;aspect_ratio=16:9&#038;quality=85" type="image/png" medium="image" width="1200" height="675">
</media:content>
<media:thumbnail url="https://rfidnews.b-cdn.net/2026/08/16-08-26.png?width=1200&#038;aspect_ratio=16:9&#038;quality=85" width="1200" height="675" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
