Store counts are the easy part of this story to report and the least interesting part of it. The number that matters sits in the middle of McGrath’s post, and it is the one JD had no power to instruct: over the same fourteen months to September 2026, source tagging across JD’s brand partners rose from around 40% of product to 73%.

The number JD could not mandate

Source tagging means the RFID label or hang tag is applied at the point of manufacture, by the supplier, rather than being stuck on later by the retailer in a distribution centre or a stockroom. For a retailer of JD’s shape it is the only version of item-level tagging that scales. JD is a multi-brand retailer: the shelves carry other companies’ products, made in other companies’ factories, under other companies’ tagging policies. A retailer can buy readers, write software and train staff entirely on its own authority. It cannot order a global sportswear brand to add an inlay to a garment tag at source.

So moving that figure from roughly 40% to 73% was a supply-chain persuasion exercise rather than a technology project, and it is the part of the programme least likely to be repeatable by anyone who assumes the hard bit is the hardware. McGrath’s own framing is that the work was about “changing behaviours, processes and mindsets” rather than “scanners, tags and technology”, and he credits the shift to brand partners increasingly recognising what RFID offers in their own retail formats and supply chains, not to pressure from JD.

That 27% gap is not a rounding error either. It is the ceiling on everything else the programme is being built towards. A store cannot behave as a reliable real-time inventory node if roughly a quarter of the units on its shelves carry no tag at all, because the untagged quarter is invisible to every count, every availability check and every downstream system that consumes the data. Read rates on passive UHF RAIN RFID in apparel and footwear are high enough that the tagged population can be trusted; the untagged population cannot be inferred.

What was actually deployed

The platform underneath the programme is ItemOptix, the RFID inventory management software from Checkpoint Systems, a supplier of retail loss prevention and RFID systems. JD signed a multi-year global software agreement covering its Sports Fashion Group stores, beginning in Europe. Notably, JD’s own IT team integrated the RFID processes into JD’s existing store software using Checkpoint’s ItemOptix SDK, rather than handing colleagues a separate application to learn beside the till system they already used. For a rollout measured in stores per week, that decision matters more than it sounds: it removes an entire category of training and change resistance.

Two other suppliers sit either side of the software, and neither has been named in the coverage of this milestone. Zebra Technologies, the enterprise mobile computing firm whose handheld computers are the default in warehouse and retail scanning, supplied the handheld RFID readers. Renovotec, a UK rugged hardware and mobility integrator, acted as the UK deployment and support partner. Between them they cover the two jobs that quietly sink RFID rollouts, which are getting working hardware into a thousand buildings and keeping it working afterwards.

In the distribution network, JD runs fixed tunnel readers, which are RFID portals mounted over a conveyor that read every tag in a carton as it passes through without anyone handling the goods. The Rochdale site near Manchester in the UK went in first, followed by Heerlen in the Netherlands serving continental Europe, with a stated throughput of up to 540,000 items per hour.

The results that justified all of it came from a deliberately small pilot: five stores in the UK, France and Spain in the second half of 2024, which returned a 12% increase in on-shelf availability, a 20% improvement in restocking speed and a 95% increase in items found. From that proof of concept to a full enterprise rollout took 76 working days, McGrath told Retail Technology Innovation Hub in January 2026. The UK and Ireland leg alone was 414 stores in 16 weeks, a pace of 25 stores a week, supported by a week-long immersive change and culture programme that trained 26 retail Change Champions.

Phase One complete is not rollout complete

It is worth being precise about what has finished, because the headline figures invite a bigger reading than they support. The 1,000 stores are the ones JD directly launched, which in McGrath’s wording covers “everything we directly control”. The wider group number he gives, 2,700 live of 4,800, leaves roughly 2,100 stores outside the programme, largely franchise and brand-partner estates where JD’s operating control is limited or indirect. Reaching 2,700 stores in fourteen months across that many territories is a genuinely large piece of work by any retail standard. It is also, by JD’s own accounting, a bit over half of the group.

Confidence rather than accuracy

What makes the source-tagging figure strategically loaded rather than merely operational is where McGrath says the programme is heading. In a May 2026 Retail Technology Innovation Hub interview he opened with “I hate RFID. Not because it doesn’t work. Not because it isn’t valuable. But because most of the industry is still looking at it through the wrong lens”. His objection is to the measure the sector reports. “Accuracy is a report. Confidence is a decision,” he said, and “what’s the point in being 98% accurate, if an agent can’t trust that last 2%?”

The destination he describes is machine-readable inventory. “Stores stop being places with stock and start becoming real-time, queryable inventory nodes,” he said, and “We’re building infrastructure for machines to trade physical goods.” His summary of the shift is blunt: “RFID isn’t a store ops tool anymore. It’s a confidence engine for agentic commerce”. He also noted that he chose Checkpoint Systems and ItemOptix specifically because it is “a fully serviceable, API first RFID platform”, which is a coherent choice if the long-term consumer of the data is software rather than a store manager.

He is dismissive of where the rest of the sector has its attention: “The industry is still talking about cycle counts”. The uncomfortable implication for anyone agreeing with him is that the agentic-commerce case rests entirely on tag coverage. An API-first platform, tunnel readers at 540,000 items an hour and 2,700 live stores are all necessary and none of them are sufficient while 27% of product arrives untagged.

The question left open

Which brand partners moved, and what moved them, is the part of this programme nobody has published. A jump from roughly 40% to 73% of product in fourteen months implies specific commercial conversations with specific suppliers, and the arguments that worked in those rooms are considerably more valuable to the rest of retail than another set of store counts. The same goes for the remaining 27%. Whether that tail closes through supplier economics, through JD tagging at its own distribution centres as a stopgap, or not at all, is the thing to watch in Phase Two.

Read more at https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7510307314281844736/

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

C&A is a clothing retailer of European origin, trading in Brazil since 1976 and listed on the São Paulo stock exchange B3 since 2019. As of September 2026 it runs 339 Brazilian stores and employs around 15,000 people there. The format it is rolling out across that estate, called Energia, shows what six years of item-level tagging lets a fashion chain build on top.

The tag layer, laid down in 2020

The project began in June 2020 at the Shopping Tamboré store in Barueri, São Paulo state, with Sensormatic Solutions, a retail loss prevention and inventory intelligence vendor, supplying the tags and software plus consulting, installation, training and project management. The pilot was scoped at ten stores: Tamboré, two in Rio de Janeiro, one in Brasília, one in Belo Horizonte and five more in São Paulo.

The numbers quoted then were the familiar ones for apparel: a read rate of around 250 items per minute, inventory accuracy up to 95%, and lost online sales from abandoned orders cut by up to half. GS1 Brasil, the Brazilian arm of the standards body behind the barcode and the EPC numbering scheme RFID tags carry, wrote the project up in October 2020 and put the ceiling higher, above 98% accuracy per item, the payoff being fewer markdowns and stock exposed to the digital store down to the last unit. C&A had more than 280 stores in Brazil at that point.

No source states a frequency band or air interface for C&A’s tags, and the retailer has not disclosed one. As generic context, reading hundreds of garments a minute and counting a whole shop floor is the application class served by passive UHF RAIN RFID, defined by EPC Gen2 and ISO/IEC 18000-63.

Francislei Donatti, then Vice-President of Commercial Operations at C&A, put the pilot in omnichannel terms. “With this system in our stores, we are achieving much greater accuracy and consequently providing faster responses about product availability,” he said. The commercial logic is a figure C&A cites repeatedly: around 80% of customers entering one of its physical stores say they researched the product online first.

From ten stores to a national programme

Scaling was quick. By September 2021 C&A had 100 stores live on RFID across 125 cities in Brazil, with a target of 200 by the end of that year. Alan Yarschel, Supply Chain Director at C&A, described the aim as pushing stock accuracy above 95% in order to grow e-commerce, and the reported result was that the assortment visible to online customers nearly doubled. Tagging does not add stock. It makes existing stock sellable by making the count trustworthy enough to publish.

Sensormatic said in 2021 that more than 10,000 stores used its RFID solution, and the 2021 coverage cited deployments at Zara, Macy’s, Sears and Lululemon as showing average sales increases of around 10%, the figure that keeps recurring across fashion retail rollouts. Vanessa do Valle, Business Developer Manager at Sensormatic Solutions, had called the direction in 2020, with interest in the firm’s RFID offering up around 40% in the preceding months: “the use of RFID technology should increase substantially soon and become established as a trend in the retail sector.”

What Energia stacks on the tag layer

Energia is where six years of tagging stop being a stock control story. Self-checkout is the obvious beneficiary: an untagged apparel basket has to be scanned garment by garment, which is the job shoppers are worst at, while a tagged basket reads in one pass. Payment sits on top of that, including facial biometric authentication marketed as “pay with a smile” for holders of the C&A Pay digital card, which the retailer says verifies a purchase in seconds.

Fitting rooms carry totems that let a customer request another size or colour without getting dressed again, which only works if the system knows, to the unit and in real time, what is on the floor and in the stockroom. Where nearby stores do not have the item, staff can locate it elsewhere and arrange home delivery.

The C&A app carries the same data into the customer’s hand: scan a product, check real-time availability, locate a specific item inside the store, read reviews, call for staff help and complete the purchase in-app while standing in the shop. In-store product location is the feature that gives the game away. You cannot direct a shopper to a garment you cannot see, and a periodic manual count cannot see it. Retail RFID is usually sold on shrink and accuracy; here it is the addressing system for the shop floor.

The format becomes the standard

The first Energia store opened at Shopping Center Norte in São Paulo’s North Zone on 22 August 2025, around 3,400 square metres over two floors, also by Gensler, with an open shopfront and no display windows, zones for jeans, basics, the ACE sportswear line and the Mindse7 contemporary line, and a cafeteria run with the chain The Coffee. “This new concept crystallises our Energia strategy, providing customers with broader assortment and great product value perception,” said Paulo Correa, CEO of C&A Brasil, who added that it would be tested for several months before becoming the official model for refits and new stores in 2026. C&A operated over 300 Brazilian stores at that point.

The test became the rollout. At the BarraShopping reopening on 9 August 2026 the company had 26 stores in the city of Rio, 47 across the state and three units nationally on the format. Two more followed in September 2026: Butantã Shopping in western São Paulo, managed by Carrefour Property, opened on Thursday 20 September at over 1,500 square metres with Click and Collect and self-checkout, taking the chain to 176 stores in the Southeast region and 50 in the city of São Paulo, and a store of over 1,300 square metres opened at the Iguatemi mall in São José do Rio Preto on 22 September 2026.

The open question about paying with a smile

The biometric element deserves more scrutiny than the launch coverage gave it. “Pay with a smile” is facial recognition in a shop, and facial geometry is biometric data. Brazil’s Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados, the LGPD, in force since 2020, treats biometric data as sensitive personal data, with narrower lawful bases than ordinary personal data and, in most commercial cases, a requirement for specific and highlighted consent.

Nothing in the reporting suggests C&A handles this improperly. What the reporting does not do is say how enrolment works: whether a C&A Pay cardholder opts in explicitly and separately, what becomes of the facial template, where it is stored, how long it is kept and how consent is withdrawn. Those answers decide whether a feature like this is a convenience or a compliance problem, and none of the coverage of the Energia stores addresses them. An RFID tag identifies a garment. A face identifies a person.

Tags as substrate, not as a stock tool

Most RFID coverage in apparel stops at accuracy and shrink, because that is where the business case is easiest to write. C&A Brasil shows what happens after that case is won. The 2020 Tamboré pilot was sold on inventory accuracy and abandoned online orders; six years on, the same tag data lets a shopper check a size from the fitting room, find a rail from a phone and leave through a self-checkout without staff touching the garments. For anyone weighing a first garment tagging pilot, the question is not what accuracy figure the tags deliver next year, but what the business can build in 2032 because the data exists.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

Bình Điền is a long established Vietnamese fertiliser producer and the owner of the Đầu Trâu (Bull Head) brand, a name well enough known in Vietnamese agriculture to be worth faking. The stated objective of the project is quality control, supply chain transparency and protecting that brand from counterfeits. The technology partner is Mỹ Lan JSC, a Vietnamese company working with Bình Điền on the deployment.

Two technologies, two different jobs

The architecture splits cleanly. RFID does the work inside the fence: bagging, product identification, production line control, warehouse in and out movements, and despatch coordination. Bình Điền points to the usual operational case, that readers capture many tags at once without line of sight, so inventory can be tracked automatically and manual error during loading, storage and retrieval falls away.

The QR code does the work outside the fence. Distributors, dealers and farmers scan a bag with a phone to check that it came from Bình Điền. According to Vietnamese coverage of the launch, the scan also returns usage guidance, nutrient recommendations for specific crops, weather alerts, pest notifications and routes into the company’s technical support, which reads like a hook into its wider smart farming activity rather than a pure authenticity check.

Ngô Văn Đông, the company’s chief executive, said RFID integrated with QR Code “is not merely a technology project”, and framed it as a commitment to quality, transparency and responsibility towards distribution partners, dealers and farmers.

The consumer facing half is the copyable half

Here is the tension at the centre of this deployment. RFID is the tier a counterfeiter never has to touch. The tier a counterfeiter does have to defeat is the QR code, and a QR code is a printed pattern that can be photographed and reprinted for nothing.

That is not a theoretical objection in Vietnam. In the same period as the Bình Điền launch, the Department of Market Management and Development at the Ministry of Commerce issued a public warning, through its director Trần Hữu Linh, that counterfeiters are copying traceability QR codes outright, in some cases printing a legitimate competitor’s code onto fake goods so that a consumer scan returns a genuine looking result. Fertilisers were named explicitly as a high risk category, alongside textiles, leather footwear, functional foods and gas cylinders. The department cited a processed ginseng drink carrying a QR code that did not work at all, and gas cylinder businesses refilling other firms’ cylinders with the identification numbers filed off.

Whether Bình Điền’s QR layer survives that attack comes down to one design decision that none of the Vietnamese coverage addresses. If each code is genuinely unique to a bag and the back end watches the scan pattern, a cloned code shows up quickly as the same identifier being scanned hundreds of times across several provinces, and the system can flag or refuse it. If the code is static per product line, it authenticates the SKU rather than the sack, and a counterfeiter only has to print it once. The RFID tier implies unique bag level identity exists in the database. It does not follow automatically that the public QR resolves to it.

What has not been stated

No operating frequency, tag type or reader supplier has been disclosed, and no throughput or read rate figures have been published. On fertiliser sacks that is a meaningful gap rather than a detail. The bags are woven polypropylene, they are stacked onto pallets and moved in racked, often metal framed warehouses, and they are handled in humid conditions and sometimes wet. Tag construction, placement on the sack and the mounting of fixed readers along a conveyor all change materially with those conditions, which is exactly why item level tagging on bagged bulk goods is harder than it sounds on a slide.

The second unstated point matters even more for the anti counterfeiting claim. It is not clear whether the RFID tag stays on the bag after despatch or whether it is an internal device only, with the QR label alone travelling to the dealer and the farmer. If the tag comes off at the loading bay, this is a warehouse and production automation project with a QR anti-counterfeiting label attached, which is a perfectly respectable thing to build, but not the same thing as an RFID authentication system reaching the field.

The national picture

Bình Điền is building this into a fragmented environment. VietnamPlus has reported that ministries, provinces and individual businesses each operate their own traceability systems with differing standards and data formats, that some companies generate traceability codes with no independent verification, and that a unified national system linked to the Ministry of Public Security’s national identity database has been proposed to stop anonymous sellers hiding behind self issued codes. A revised Law on Product Quality took effect on 1 July 2026 and requires traceability for high risk goods, and Vietnam’s 19 free trade agreements, 17 of them already in force, carry rules of origin obligations of their own.

In other words, a manufacturer that puts verifiable identity on its own output is ahead of the policy, not behind it. The measure of whether it works will not be the launch event. It will be what the back end does in early 2027 the first time the same identifier is scanned in two provinces on the same day.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

lululemon is the Vancouver-based technical apparel brand founded in 1998, best known for yoga and training wear and now a global multichannel retailer. Wuhan is its third distribution hub in mainland China, after Shanghai and Guangzhou, built in partnership with SF Express, China’s largest express parcel and integrated logistics group. It also houses what the brand calls its first global comprehensive service centre, offering alterations, tailoring and customisation to customers nationally through both online and physical store channels.

The RFID read comes first, everything else follows

An RFID tunnel reader is a shrouded arch fitted with antennas: cartons or totes pass through it and every tagged item inside is read in bulk, with nobody pointing a scanner at anything. In apparel it is the standard way to verify a carton’s contents in a second or two rather than opening it. At Wuhan, tunnel readers sit on the inbound line alongside static DWS equipment, which stands for dimensioning, weighing and scanning: a station that captures a case’s size and weight in passing, for cubing and carrier rating. Unloading robots and AGVs, automated guided vehicles that move pallets and cases without a driver, feed the line. Chinese trade coverage described the result as second-level archiving: the goods-in record is written within seconds of arrival, with no manual scan step.

What the read produces is an EPC-level record. EPC stands for Electronic Product Code, the scheme that gives every tagged item a unique serial identity rather than a product code shared with every other garment of the same style and size. That distinction is the whole point: a barcode tells you what the item is, an EPC tells you which one it is. lululemon and SF are using that serialised identity to carry traceability from goods-in through storage, handling, picking, buffering and despatch verification, all held on SF’s Baichuan platform.

The automation the read feeds

Storage is built on an AirRob vertical system, credited in the launch coverage with roughly three times the density of a conventional warehouse and more than 4,000 cases an hour. Outbound uses high-speed swing and cross-belt sorters. The returns operation, always the awkward end of apparel logistics, runs to more than 160 standard workstations with high-speed sortation and singulation equipment. Singulation is the step that separates a jumbled bulk flow into a single stream of one item at a time, spaced out so a sorter or a reader can deal with each one individually.

Above all of that sits Baichuan’s AI layer, which the coverage says handles wave aggregation, replenishment decisions, case optimisation and sortation scheduling. Those decisions are only as good as the data beneath them, which is why the serialised read at the door matters more than any single piece of mechanical handling.

Coverage, and the SF Express relationship

As of the September 2026 launch the Wuhan centre handles around 50% of lululemon’s China retail and e-commerce fulfilment. Once fully ramped it is projected to serve as the primary distribution point for 85 stores across 18 provinces, with a 99% next-day delivery rate claimed for the e-commerce regions it covers.

SF Express has been working with lululemon since 2022, expanding from parcel delivery into warehouse fulfilment and supply chain digitalisation. Its technology arm markets an RFID offering under the Fengzhixing name, aimed at factories, warehouses, distribution, transfer hubs and stores, with footwear and apparel among its named target sectors. SF publishes no technical specifications for that product, so no operating frequency, read rate, range or standards conformance has been stated for the Wuhan deployment. Tunnel reading and EPC-level item traceability in apparel are conventionally done with UHF RAIN RFID, but that is general industry practice rather than a published specification of this installation.

Consistent with a long-standing approach

lululemon has leaned on RFID network-wide for years. In March 2020, chief executive Calvin McDonald said of the company’s pandemic response: “Our technology with the use of RFID we can access product at any point across our network, not just DCs but at our stores as well from ship from store.” That visibility across both distribution centres and shops let it shift stock away from closed stores and fulfil online orders from wherever the goods sat.

Wuhan is not the only build-out in progress. Separately, lululemon celebrated a distribution centre of over one million square feet at Brampton, Ontario on 8 July 2026, operational from June 2026 and serving e-commerce in eastern Canada and the eastern United States. That Canadian site uses an AutoStore installation with 292,000 bins, 525 R5 Pro robots and eight kilometres of conveyance. RFID was not mentioned in the Brampton announcement, and the two facilities should not be conflated.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

Tageos is a Montpellier-based designer and manufacturer of RFID, NFC and wireless IoT inlays and tags, part of the Fedrigoni Group since 2022, with manufacturing and offices across Europe, the Americas and Asia. An inlay is the working core of a smart label: a thin antenna, typically etched or printed aluminium, with an RFID chip bonded to it, supplied on a reel so that label converters and service bureaus can laminate it into printed face stock and turn it into a finished label.

Why a metal antenna in a microwave is a problem

RAIN RFID is the passive UHF branch of RFID, working in the 860 to 960 MHz band and readable at a few metres by a handheld or a fixed portal, with no battery in the tag. It is the technology behind item-level tagging in apparel retail, and it has been moving into grocery and food service for the same reasons: fast stock counts, accurate availability data and tills that read a whole basket at once.

Food brings a complication clothing does not. A UHF antenna is physically a thin strip of metal with edges and corners. Put metal in a microwave and the field concentrates at those edges and at any sharp point in the conductor, where the induced voltage can be high enough to ionise the air and throw a visible spark. Fine traces and thin foil are the worst offenders, because they have plenty of edge and very little mass to absorb the energy. That is why a conventional RAIN inlay on a ready meal has to be peeled off before the pack goes in the oven, and why a label that can stay put is worth designing for.

Tageos says the EOS-450 MW antennas use specialised designs engineered to resist arcing and sparking under defined microwave conditions. It has not published the geometry, a power rating or the test regime behind that, so it reads as a controlled-conditions result rather than a blanket guarantee for any oven at any setting. The commercial point stands either way: a label that survives reheating can stay on the pack for its whole life, from the factory to the customer’s kitchen.

Two chip platforms, one antenna family

The variants differ in the silicon rather than the concept. The EOS-450 MW M830 is built on Impinj’s M830. Impinj is a Seattle-based maker of RAIN RFID chips and readers and one of the two dominant suppliers of UHF tag ICs. The M830 offers 128-bit EPC memory, extended read range, AutoTune, improved backscatter efficiency and Gen2X enhancements. AutoTune is the chip correcting its own input match to compensate for the way nearby material detunes the antenna, which matters on packaging full of liquid and foil.

The EOS-450 MW UX uses NXP’s UCODE X. NXP Semiconductors is a Dutch chipmaker and the other major supplier in this market. UCODE X gives configurable EPC memory from 96 to 208 bits with up to 32 bits of user memory, fast encoding, very low power consumption, Gen2v2 compliance and memory safeguards with auto-repair. Encoding speed matters commercially, because a converter writing millions of unique codes a day is paid by throughput.

Offering one antenna family on two competing chip platforms is deliberate. Tageos calls it a technology-agnostic approach, and in practice it also lets a buyer work around whichever IC has better availability or pricing that quarter.

What the tags are for

Tageos lists the familiar grocery set: inventory and expiry date management, track and trace, loss prevention, and self-checkout in food retail and in QSRs, the quick service restaurant category that covers fast food chains. Expiry date management tends to pay for itself first, because a tag carrying a unique identity rather than a product code lets staff find the exact packs about to date out instead of working along a shelf by hand. That overlaps with food safety record keeping, where per-item traceability is increasingly expected rather than optional.

“The market for RAIN RFID-based food tagging is growing rapidly, and customers are increasingly demanding inlays that are specifically tailored to the practical requirements of modern food packaging and handling,” said Jeremy Wade, Vice President of Sales Americas, Advanced Business, at Tageos. “We are combining microwave compatibility with best-in-class RAIN RFID performance, a combination that is essential for reliable, large-scale item-level visibility.”

The inlays come in dry, wet clear, paper-face and plastic-face formats. A dry inlay is antenna and chip with no adhesive, a wet inlay adds pressure-sensitive adhesive under a clear film face, and the paper-face and plastic-face versions arrive already carrying a printable surface.

Tageos is presenting the pair as a first step rather than a finished range, with further microwave-compatible inlays planned. The significant part is arguably not the two part numbers, but that a major inlay manufacturer now treats microwave survivability as a standing requirement for food rather than a special order.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

Goodwill Industries of Southern New Jersey and Philadelphia is a nonprofit founded in Camden in 1948. It operates thrift stores and donation centres across 11 New Jersey counties and the city of Philadelphia, and puts the trading surplus into job training, career services and employment placement for people with disabilities and other barriers to work. That structure matters when reading the numbers below: retail is the funding engine for the mission, so stock walking out of the door is training that does not get delivered. The affiliate is one of about 165 Goodwill chapters in the United States and, according to RFID Journal’s 2024 coverage, the first of them to adopt RFID.

The work has already been recognised outside the organisation. In April 2024 the deployment won Best Retail or Restaurant Implementation at the 18th Annual RFID Journal Awards, cited for using RFID to improve the customer experience while tightening inventory management, cutting labour cost and enabling better loss control.

What Goodwill reports from the RFID rollout

The organisation’s own summary of the outcomes, covering the 12 months to September 2026, is as follows:

• About $1.2 million invested in RFID technology, against an estimated $4.38 million net gain after implementation.
• Annual shrink down from more than $1.49 million to approximately $154,000.
• More than 15,000 labour hours a year removed from manual scanning at the point of sale.
• Higher average transaction values and better merchandise availability on the shop floor.
• Inventory visibility across both retail stock and the production areas where donated goods are sorted, priced and prepared for sale.
• Exception monitoring, warehouse visibility and reporting that now feeds pricing decisions rather than sitting in a monthly summary.

These are Goodwill’s own reported figures rather than independently audited ones, and the comparison periods and accounting basis have not been made public. That is normal for an end-user case study, but they are best read as the operator’s measurement rather than as a verified benchmark.

For scale, the labour figure has grown as the rollout has widened. RFID Journal reported 10,406 checkout hours saved a year across roughly two million transactions when it covered the deployment in 2024. The organisation now puts the annual saving from removing manual point of sale scanning above 15,000 hours.

How the deployment is built

The September 2026 summary from Goodwill does not restate the technical specification, so the most detailed public description of the hardware remains RFID Journal’s 2024 account. That coverage named RES RFID as the solution provider, supplying development, hardware, software and the RFID labels themselves, with MasterTel USA acting as project consultant and Fujitsu involved in testing a walkthrough reader tunnel. It described a UHF RFID deployment across 27 stores, with a pilot that started in 2022 at the Maple Shade and Audubon locations in New Jersey, and read accuracy quoted at 99 percent and above against store inventories of roughly 40,000 to 60,000 items each.

The reader estate described at that point was unusually broad for a resale operator: readers built into sales counters so an associate can pass a handful of goods over the pad in one movement, cart tunnel readers, handheld readers for cycle counting, exit door antennas, and readers on self-checkout kiosks. Tagging used colour-coded hangtags and labels, the colour carrying pricing information for staff and customers in the way thrift stores have always used colour-coded tickets. Store counts and hardware move over a multi-year rollout, so treat that as the 2024 build rather than as the current configuration.

Why thrift retail is a hard case for item-level tagging

Most published retail RFID success stories come from branded apparel, where the source tagging happens at the factory. The brand owner encodes the tag, the item arrives at the distribution centre already identified, and the retailer inherits an item-level inventory it did not have to create. None of that applies to a donation-funded thrift operator.

In secondhand retail every item is effectively a one-off. There is no supplier feed, no GTIN, often no matching second unit anywhere in the estate, and no upstream party with any reason to tag it. The tag has to be applied in the production room by the same team that sorts, grades and prices the donation, which means the labour cost of tagging lands entirely on the retailer and has to be paid back out of the savings. It also means the RFID programme and the merchandising process are the same process: the moment an item is tagged is the moment it becomes a countable, priceable, traceable unit.

The shrink number is the headline, but the real change is that a business built on unique, unbarcoded stock now has an item-level inventory at all. Everything downstream, the pricing intelligence and the exception reporting included, rests on that one fact.

Putting the shrink figure in context

Shrink at this scale is not typical of general retail. The National Retail Federation’s National Retail Security Survey put average shrink across US retailers at 1.68 percent of revenue in its 2024 edition, the highest reading in more than a decade, before the NRF discontinued that long-running annual survey over methodology concerns. RFID Journal’s 2024 reporting on Goodwill New Jersey described losses running at roughly 8 to 10 percent of inventory, an estimated $5 million a year across the chapter at that time.

The loss figures Goodwill cites are not directly comparable with that earlier estimate, and no reconciliation between them has been published, so they are best read as separate measurements on different bases rather than one continuous series. What the RFID data changed is subtler than the arithmetic anyway. Before item-level tagging, shrink in an operation like this is a residual: the gap between what you thought you had and what you eventually sold, discovered late and attributable to nothing in particular. With tags on the merchandise and antennas at the exit, loss becomes an event with a time, a location and a list of items, which is what makes it addressable. Detection at the door is the visible part. Knowing precisely what left is the part that changes behaviour.

Pricing, warehousing and consignment

The organisation lists several second-order uses that only became possible once the inventory existed. Accurate stock data feeds dynamic pricing, so markdowns can follow how long an item has actually been on the floor rather than a fixed colour-tag rotation. Warehouse and production visibility extends the same tracking behind the scenes, across the sorting and preparation operations and the separate home medical equipment side of the business, which is closer to asset tracking than to shop floor merchandising.

There is a commercial angle too. Goodwill says item-level identity makes it easier to work with consignors and with brands looking for an outlet for excess stock, because sales tracking and sustainability tracing can both be reported back per item. Turning every unit into a traceable asset is the same capability that sits beneath product-level transparency work elsewhere in the industry, and resale operators holding item-level data look well placed as lifecycle and circularity reporting requirements tighten.

An open offer to other operators

Joe Vallely, Chief Operating Officer at Goodwill Industries of Southern New Jersey and Philadelphia, has invited comparable organisations to get in touch:

“If you are a fellow Goodwill organisation, nonprofit retailer, thrift operator, or traditional retailer exploring RFID, we would be happy to share our journey, lessons learned, implementation strategies, and operational best practices.

Our team has now lived through the planning, deployment, adoption, reporting, loss prevention integration, and operational transformation stages of RFID implementation. We believe there is tremendous opportunity for organisations to accelerate their results by learning from those who have already gone down the path.”

That is a more useful offer than it sounds. The failure mode in retail RFID is rarely the physics. It is the tagging process, the staff adoption, the point at which the data becomes trusted enough to act on, and the year or two of unglamorous work in between. An operator willing to talk openly about those stages is rarer than another vendor case study.

Read more at https://goodwillnj.org/

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

How the mandate got here

Walmart’s first RFID mandate, announced in 2003, asked top suppliers to tag pallets and cases and was quietly wound down within a few years, a costly lesson in mandating ahead of the technology. The modern programme is different in kind: it began with item-level tagging of apparel in 2020, when tag prices, read performance and standards had matured. In early 2022 Walmart wrote to suppliers extending the requirement to home goods, electronics, toys and sporting goods with effect from September 2022, and further waves through 2023, 2024 and 2025 brought in categories including automotive, books, crafts, hardware, lawn and garden, media and gaming, paint and stationery. The 2025 letters also updated tag performance specifications for some categories already in scope. By 2026 the programme covers most of general merchandise, with compliance expected on every shipment.

What suppliers must actually do

• Tag every sellable unit, not just cases or pallets. The tag travels on the item the customer buys.
• Use RAIN RFID (UHF, EPC Gen2v2) operating in the US 902 to 928 MHz band.
• Source approved inlays. Inlays must come from manufacturers approved under the ARC programme at Auburn University’s RFID Lab, the independent body that tests tag performance against Walmart’s specification categories, and must meet the spec grade for the product type.
• Serialise correctly. Each tag carries a unique GS1-standard electronic product code; duplicated or malformed serial numbers count as non-compliance just as missing tags do.
• Place tags to the playbook. Walmart publishes placement guidance per category so store readers can rely on consistent performance.

Enforcement is commercial rather than theoretical: shipments that arrive untagged or wrongly tagged attract chargebacks, and persistent non-compliance puts shelf space and the supplier relationship itself at risk.

Who is exempt

The mandate carries narrow exemptions, including seasonal, horticulture and celebration categories, and items sold by third-party marketplace sellers fulfilled through Walmart Fulfillment Services. Grocery, consumables and pharmacy are not mandated as of August 2026.

Why compliant suppliers stop complaining

The striking pattern of the modern mandate is how quickly the compliance cost turns into a benefit the supplier keeps. Item-level tagging lifted Walmart’s inventory accuracy in apparel to levels barcode counting never reached, and that accuracy flows both ways: fewer out-of-stocks means fewer lost sales for the supplier, and fewer “nil-picks” for online orders picked from store shelves. Impinj, the Seattle chipmaker whose silicon sits in a large share of the tags involved, cites survey data that 82 percent of shoppers will switch brands when they hit a stockout, which is the supplier’s revenue walking to a competitor’s product. Suppliers who tagged early also inherit an item-level data stream they can use in their own operations, which is why several went on to tag lines they sell through other retailers too.

What comes next

The widely expected next frontiers are health and beauty, consumables and ultimately grocery, and the industry’s chipmakers have been pointing at food and grocery as the next big inflection, a theme we examined in our review of the Q2 2026 RFID earnings season. As of August 2026 Walmart has not mandated any of them; when it does, the volumes involved would dwarf the general merchandise programme.

The mandate also matters well beyond Bentonville. Retail mandates cascade: Target, Macy’s and Nordstrom run item-level programmes of their own, and Walmart’s requirements effectively set the floor for tag volumes, prices and performance across the industry, a dynamic covered in our State of RFID in 2026 overview. For UK and European brands, the practical point is simple: if you sell into Walmart’s US stores in a mandated category, the requirement applies to you, and the tagging capability you build for it is the same one European retailers and the EU’s Digital Product Passport rules will increasingly expect.

Suppliers starting from zero typically begin with an ARC-approved inlay supplier and a service bureau or label partner who can print and encode serialised tags; the RFID News supplier directory lists tag makers, label converters and integrators by category and region.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

According to that reporting, the rollout follows a pilot earlier this year that the supermarket judged a success. Drapers says the trial gave Tu better visibility of stock levels, sped up replenishment and let the team manage stock more efficiently, the three benefits apparel retailers most often cite when they move to item-level tagging.

Ben Smith, Sainsbury’s clothing managing director, told Drapers: “We’ve introduced RFID this summer.”

He added: “We are going through a rollout now which allows us to maintain all of that product and spot any gaps that we [Tu] can replenish quickly.”

That last point is the operational heart of it. Gap detection on the shop floor is one of the clearest wins in retail RFID, and it is the reason so many fashion chains adopted the technology before their grocery counterparts did.

Catching up with the fashion pack

Drapers notes that the move brings Sainsbury’s into line with high street fashion rivals that already run RFID across their stores, among them Inditex’s Zara, Uniqlo and H&M. Tu sits in an unusual position, a sizeable clothing business operating inside a grocery estate, so the rollout is being layered onto shop floors that were not originally designed around apparel stock control.

The report also places the rollout against Sainsbury’s most recent trading update, covering the 16 weeks to 20 June, in which the retailer highlighted improvements in “availability and style” despite sales dipping 2.1% year on year.

General industry context

For readers less familiar with the technology, and by way of general background rather than anything confirmed about this particular deployment, apparel RFID almost always means UHF RAIN RFID tags applied at item level, usually at source in the supply chain. Staff then cycle count the sales floor and stockroom with handheld readers, often reading thousands of items in a few minutes, which typically lifts stock accuracy from the 60% to 70% range seen with barcode-only counting into the 90s. Once the stock file is that accurate, a system can reliably tell the difference between an item that has genuinely sold out and one sitting unfound in the back, which is exactly the gap spotting Ben Smith describes.

None of the specifics of the Sainsbury’s implementation have been made public. There is no confirmed detail on tag or reader suppliers, on whether the deployment uses handheld reading alone or adds fixed infrastructure, on where in the supply chain tags are applied, or on the commercial case behind it. We are not going to guess at any of that.

We are following up our contacts within Sainsbury’s to find more and will bring you the full case study if and when we can.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

At the centre of the pitch are the RFID-enabled HXC-Series Automated Blood Management Refrigerators. According to the company, item-level tagging of blood bags allows instant location lookup inside the cabinet, bedside requests from the ward, electronic cross-matching at the point of transfusion, and retrieval times of under one minute. The cabinets use secure drawers with ozone sterilisation, and inventory counts and alarms are generated automatically rather than by a technician with a clipboard.

Deployments named by Haier Biomedical

Three sites were put forward at the congress. Daniele Pericolini, an automation solution specialist at the New Arcispedale Sant’Anna Hospital in Ferrara, Italy, presented that hospital’s move from paper records to R-Series Automated Blood Management Refrigerators, and reported full traceability with what the company describes as zero errors. Zhou Weidong, Haier Biomedical’s blood chain product manager, covered HemoRio Blood Bank in Brazil and the Asia Pacific Medical Center in the Philippines, both reported as running full digital tracking from the start of deployment.

Alongside the refrigerators, Haier Biomedical showed a plasma apheresis system certified to EU MDR, an automatic blood component separator and a plasma contact shock freezer. The company states that its U-Blood solutions are now operational in Germany, Italy, Thailand, the Philippines, Morocco, Brazil, Zambia and Kenya.

What the RFID architecture actually says

The U-Blood Network product page describes an IoT-based blood safety system intended to serve a whole city’s blood supply as one platform. RFID tags go on the blood bags, and the supporting hardware listed includes RFID read-write devices, RFID detectors and an RFID walk-in cold room. Coverage runs from collection and batch verification through storage, inventory, transport and cold chain tracking to electronic blood matching and real-time transfusion recording. That is a coherent chain of custody model on paper, and it is the direction most blood services have been heading.

What is missing is the detail a technical buyer would ask for in the first meeting. Haier Biomedical has not published a frequency band, a tag specification, an air interface standard or a reader model for any part of the system. Blood bag tagging in smart refrigerated cabinets is built both ways in this market, with HF at 13.56 MHz favoured for dense, close-range item-level reads in trays and drawers, and UHF used where longer read range and faster bulk inventory matter. Which route Haier has taken is not stated, so it cannot be assumed. The company also claims to be “the only company offering RFID tags with customized integration”, which is a strong claim in a market with several established blood bank RFID suppliers.

It is worth being clear about sourcing. This story rests on a single company-authored release, reprinted widely across the wires. Neither HemoRio nor the Asia Pacific Medical Center has published anything independently about the deployment, the Ferrara hospital’s own site carries nothing on it, and no RFID trade body has covered it. The claims here are Haier Biomedical’s own, and remain uncorroborated by the named hospitals and blood services.

Read more at https://www.haiermedical.com/u-blood-network/343.html

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

M&S started its RFID journey with a modest pilot project tagging men’s suits. The early results were promising enough to justify further investment, but progress was slow. The technology was expensive, with tags costing roughly five times what they do today, and the business case was still being built one department at a time.

The Beauty Product Problem

As M&S expanded RFID tagging across its non-food product lines, beauty and cosmetics products emerged as the most stubborn challenge. The physical properties of these items, including metal components in packaging, foil-lined containers, and liquid contents, created significant interference with radio frequency signals. Standard RFID tags simply could not deliver reliable reads when attached to products containing metal or liquids.

Working closely with longtime partner Avery Dennison, M&S invested years in developing specialised tag formats to overcome these obstacles. The collaboration produced 10 distinct tag formats and, because the retailer uses different colour codes for various product categories, a total of 70 tag variations. Some were designed specifically for apparel, others for beauty products, and still others for items containing metal or liquids. Each tag also had to meet the aesthetic standards demanded by cosmetic manufacturers, adding another layer of complexity.

Overcoming Senior Management Resistance

Perhaps even more challenging than the technical hurdles was the battle for internal buy-in. Richard Jenkins, M&S’s head of loss prevention and the driving force behind the RFID programme, has spoken candidly about the resistance he faced from senior leadership. There were individuals in senior positions who lacked understanding of the technology yet spoke with great confidence about its limitations. During particularly difficult periods, Jenkins and his team had to fight against active de-investment in the programme.

To counter this scepticism, M&S established a cross-functional steering committee that brought together representatives from corporate leadership, IT, store operations, and finance. Retail and store staff provided frontline feedback on deployment issues, while finance executives helped build a rigorous business case demonstrating clear return on investment for each phase of the rollout.

Testing, Validation, and Results

M&S took a methodical approach to validation, constructing a mock store at its headquarters to test tag performance across different materials before rolling out to live retail environments. This careful testing regime helped the team achieve consistent, accurate reads even on traditionally difficult product categories.

The results speak for themselves. SKU accuracy improved from just 68 per cent when the project expanded to a full product range in 2014, to an impressive 91.5 per cent by the second half of 2021. The retailer now uses approximately 350 million RFID tags per year across its stores.

Lessons in Persistence

The M&S story offers several valuable lessons for any organisation considering RFID adoption. First, technical challenges like metal and liquid interference are solvable with the right partnerships and sufficient investment in tag development. Second, internal resistance from senior management can be just as significant a barrier as any technical limitation. Building a cross-functional team with clear ROI metrics is essential for maintaining momentum. Third, bringing software development in-house gave M&S greater control and agility, helping the retailer adapt the technology to its specific needs.

M&S’s own-brand business model also proved to be a strategic advantage, enabling tagging at source rather than in-store. This simplified logistics and reduced costs, a benefit that retailers relying heavily on third-party brands may find harder to replicate.

Today, M&S continues to push the boundaries, exploring robotic tag reading in stores and planning new formats where automation can track every item entering and leaving in near real time. The retailer’s RFID journey is a testament to what persistence and strategic thinking can achieve, even when the odds and the boardroom seem stacked against you.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

The journey started with small-scale trials focused on high-value product categories such as spirits, electronics, and health and beauty lines. By applying RAIN RFID UHF inlays at item level, Tesco was able to build a real-time picture of exactly what was on the shelf, what was in the back room, and what was in transit. The results from those initial pilots were hard to ignore. Inventory accuracy, which had historically hovered around 65 to 70 percent using traditional barcode-based cycle counts, climbed above 95 percent within the trial stores. For a retailer handling millions of SKUs every week, that improvement translated directly into fewer out-of-stocks, better on-shelf availability, and higher customer satisfaction scores.

Shrinkage reduction proved to be another powerful driver. Retail shrinkage, the loss of inventory through theft, administrative error, or supplier fraud, costs UK retailers billions of pounds each year. By tagging products with RAIN RFID inlays and performing regular automated inventory counts using handheld RFID readers, Tesco gained granular visibility into where losses were occurring. Patterns that had previously gone undetected became obvious. Specific stores, delivery routes, and even individual product lines could be flagged for investigation. Within the first full year of expanded RFID deployment, Tesco reported a measurable drop in shrinkage across participating categories, saving millions of pounds annually.

Overcoming scepticism within the UK retail sector was not straightforward. British retailers have traditionally been cautious adopters of new in-store technology, and the memory of earlier RFID hype cycles that failed to deliver on their promises lingered. Tesco addressed this by taking a phased, evidence-led approach. Each stage of the rollout was backed by clear data showing improvements in stock accuracy, reductions in labour hours spent on manual counts, and hard financial savings. Store managers, who are often the hardest audience to convince, became advocates once they saw how RFID freed their teams from tedious counting tasks and allowed them to focus on customer-facing activities.

The technology infrastructure behind the deployment relies on passive UHF RAIN RFID, operating in the 860 to 960 MHz frequency band. This choice was deliberate. Passive RAIN RFID tags are low cost, require no battery, and can be read at distances of several metres, making them ideal for high-volume retail environments where speed and scalability matter. Tesco worked closely with tag manufacturers, inlay converters, and its supply chain partners to ensure that source tagging, the process of applying RFID inlays at the point of manufacture, became embedded in supplier workflows rather than bolted on as an afterthought.

The financial case has only strengthened over time. Tesco has reported annual savings running into tens of millions of pounds when factoring in reduced shrinkage, lower labour costs for inventory management, and improved sales driven by better on-shelf availability. Industry analysts have pointed to Tesco’s programme as proof that RFID can deliver a compelling return on investment in grocery and general merchandise retail, not just in the apparel sector where item-level tagging first gained traction.

For other UK retailers still weighing up whether to commit to RFID, Tesco’s experience offers a clear message. The technology works, the business case is proven, and the barriers to adoption are lower than many assume. What started as a cautious experiment has become a cornerstone of Tesco’s inventory strategy, and the retailer shows no sign of slowing down.

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

Spec H sits inside the GS1 Tag Performance Specifications, a set of letter-graded profiles that GS1 created so brand owners can pick RFID tags against consistent, measurable criteria rather than vendor marketing. Each specification sets out the read performance a tag is expected to deliver across free air, against different substrates, close to other tags, and at varying angles. The idea is that if a brand says it only buys Spec H certified tags, it can be confident every inlay on its packs or garments will behave in broadly the same way on the reader.

For SML, being first to market with a Spec H product is a notable claim. The company already supplies tags and inlays at scale to apparel, accessories and general merchandise brands, and has been pushing to keep pace as retailers move beyond store replenishment and towards loss prevention, self-checkout and inventory accuracy at pack level. A wider range of GS1 specifications means suppliers can match the right inlay to the right product rather than forcing one design to cover every use case.

The GB25U8 is aimed squarely at applications where GS1 Spec H performance is called for in the brand’s tagging rules. In practice this tends to mean products where tag orientation, proximity to other items and the substrate behind the tag are all variable and all need to be read reliably in store or in the distribution centre. By meeting the Spec H envelope, SML is effectively telling its customers that the inlay has been measured against GS1’s defined test regime and delivers against it, rather than against a bespoke manufacturer test.

The launch also fits a broader industry trend. GS1’s performance specifications have quietly become a shortcut in tender documents and tagging mandates, because they give supply chain and procurement teams a common language when comparing inlays. Expect more vendors to follow SML’s lead with their own Spec H certified products over the coming year as retail programmes expand and as RAIN RFID continues its move into new categories including food, beauty and home.

For brand owners already operating item-level RFID, the GB25U8 gives them a defined option to slot into their approved tag list. For brands still planning a programme, it is a reminder that matching the inlay to the application by specification, rather than by price or availability, is now the expected starting point for any serious RAIN RFID rollout.

Read more at https://www.sml.com/blogs/sml-rfid-launches-gb25u8-inlay-the-first-spec-h-inlay/

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.

The deployment tackles a problem that will be familiar to any retailer dealing with high SKU counts and unpredictable seasonal demand. Party Fiesta’s product range shifts dramatically around Halloween, Christmas, and Carnival, making traditional inventory management a constant headache. Manual stock counts were time-consuming, error-prone, and simply couldn’t keep pace with the volume of product movement across the shop floor.

The solution centres on Impinj M700 platform-based RFID tags applied at item level, giving every product in the store a unique digital identity. Overhead Zebra Technologies ATR7000 ceiling-mounted RFID readers continuously scan the retail environment, tracking product movement in real time without any manual intervention. Kyubi System describes the result as a “fully sensorized retail environment,” and the phrase is apt. The store essentially knows where its inventory is at all times.

At the point of sale, Party Fiesta has installed the AIR! EASY Pay Table, an RFID-enabled checkout surface that reads all tagged items simultaneously. Customers simply place their products on the table and the system identifies everything instantly, removing the need for individual barcode scanning. It is a faster, smoother checkout experience that cuts queue times and reduces staffing pressure at tills.

Behind the scenes, middleware ties the RFID data layer into Party Fiesta’s existing enterprise systems, ensuring that inventory counts, replenishment triggers, and sales data all flow through a single source of truth. This integration is critical. RFID hardware alone does not transform a retail operation. The real value comes when tag reads feed directly into stock management, purchasing, and loss prevention workflows.

The results speak for themselves. Party Fiesta now has real-time inventory visibility across the store, phantom stock has been eliminated, and stock-outs have been significantly reduced. Staff who previously spent hours on manual counts have been redeployed to customer-facing roles, improving the overall shopping experience. For a retailer managing thousands of SKUs with concentrated peak demand windows, these are meaningful operational gains.

The project is a strong example of how UHF RFID technology, when deployed as a complete ecosystem rather than a point solution, can fundamentally change how a retail store operates. Party Fiesta’s Barcelona flagship is now a reference site for Retail 4.0, and it would not be surprising to see the chain roll this out across its wider European store network.

Read more at https://www.kyubisystem.com/en/party-fiesta-enters-retail-4-0-with-rfid-kyubi-systems-success-story-published-by-rfid-journal/

This article first appeared on RFID News (rfidnews.co.uk), the independent news site for RFID and NFC. Republication and AI use are welcome with RFID News credited as the source and a link to the original.